| |
Cryptozoology
Cryptozoology:
"The study of Hidden Animals"
- is the study of, and search for, animals
which fall outside of contemporary zoological
catalogs. It consists of two primary fields
of research:
The search for living examples of animals
taxonomically identified through fossil
records, but which are believed to be extinct,
The search for animals that fall outside
of taxonomic records due to a lack of empirical
evidence, but for which anecdotal evidence
exists in the form of myths, legends, or
undocumented sightings.
Those
involved in cryptozoological study are known
as cryptozoologists; the animals that they
study are often referred to as "cryptids",
a term coined by John Wall in 1983. Cryptozoology
has seen very little attention from the
mainstream scientific community, and is
typically classified as pseudoscience because
of erratic application of the scientific
method.
Overview
of Cryptozoology
Invention
of the term "cryptozoology" is
often attributed to zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans.
But in his book, In the Wake of Sea Serpents,
Heuvelmans attributes coinage of the term
to the late Scottish explorer and adventurer
Ivan T. Sanderson. Heuvelmans' 1955 book,
On the Track of Unknown Animals, traces
the scholarly origins of the discipline
to Anthonid Cornelis Oudemans and his 1892
study, The Great Sea Serpent. Heuvelmans
argued that cryptozoology should be undertaken
with scientific rigor, but with an open-minded,
interdisciplinary approach. He also stressed
that attention should be given to local,
urban and folkloric sources regarding such
creatures, arguing that while often layered
in unlikely and fantastic elements, folktales
can have small grains of truth and important
information regarding these organisms. Loren
Coleman, a modern popularizer of cryptozoology,
has chronicled the history and personalities
of cryptozoology in his books.
Another
notable book on the subject is Willy Ley's
Exotic Zoology (1959). Ley was best known
for his writings on rocketry and related
topics, but he was trained in paleontology,
and did write a number of books about animals.
Ley's collection Exotic Zoology is of some
interest to cryptozoology, as he discusses
the Yeti and sea serpents, as well as relict
dinosaurs. The book's first section ("Myth?")
entertains the possibility that some legendary
creatures (like the sirrush, the unicorn
or the cyclops) might be based on actual
animals, through misinterpretation of the
animals and/or their remains. Perhaps the
most rigorously scientific analyses of cryptids
can be found in the works of British zoologist
and cryptozoologist Dr. Karl Shuker, who
has published 12 books and countless articles
on numerous cryptozoological subjects since
the mid-1980s.
Science
and Cryptozoology
Discoveries
of previously unknown animals are often
subject to great attention, but cryptozoology
per se has seen relatively little interest
from mainstream scientists. As historian
Mike Dash notes, few scientists doubt there
are thousands of unknown animals, particularly
invertebrates, awaiting discovery. However,
as Dash notes, cryptozoologists are largely
uninterested in researching and cataloging
newly-discovered species of ants or beetles,
instead focusing their efforts towards "more
elusive" creatures that have often
defied decades of work aimed at confirming
their existence.
The
majority of mainstream criticism of cryptozoology
is directed towards the search for megafauna
cryptids such as Bigfoot, the Yeren, and
the Loch Ness Monster which appear often
in popular culture, but for which there
is little or no scientific support. Scientists
argue that mega-fauna cryptids are unlikely
to exist undetected in great enough numbers
to maintain a breeding population, and are
unlikely to be able to survive in their
reported habitats due to issues of climate
and food supply.
As
such, cryptozoology has never been embraced
by the scientific community. Most experts
on the matter consider the Bigfoot legend
to be a combination of folklore and hoaxes
and cryptozoology is considered to be a
pseudoscience by mainstream zoologists and
biologists. Noted objections to cryptozoology
include unreliable eyewitness accounts,
lack of scientific and physical evidence,
and over-reliance on confirmation rather
than refutation.
Cryptozoologists
argue that much of the planet remains unexplored,
especially deep oceans, so cryptozoological
claims about oceanic cryptids should be
given more credence. By plotting the discovery
rate of new species, C. G. M. Paxton estimated
that as many as 47 large oceanic species
remain undiscovered. The discoveries of
the Coelacanth and the megamouth shark are
examples of how deep-sea animals can remain
undetected for years.
|
|